New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000111
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 08.11.2026 20:52
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 707 / 1000
Tonal balance225 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity141 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape136 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics88 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour92 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness25 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
8.8 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
90.8 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −6.2 dB)
Dip in the region
800 Hz – 1.6 kHz (up to −5.8 dB)
Lack of deep bass
below 80 Hz (up to −5.0 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.7 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −1.8 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.0 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −2.0 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity74.9 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)70.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)92.0 %
Dynamic similarity58.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)24.6 %
Stereo stage width134 %
Overall score707 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
Mid: 800 Hz – 1.6 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.25 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.7
Low: below 80 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 80 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 250 – 500 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −2…3 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8

Check the crossovers and phase at 800 Hz – 1.6 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 160 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.254
Track start in the recording1.78 s
Compared segment3:56
Correlation0.366
Peak sharpness (PSR)65.7
Clock drift+30.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−48.3 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio34.1 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.32Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+0.5 dB
Recording file20261108_234553.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−11.5
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−0.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP−0.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−8.6
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−14.3 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB13.6 dB
LRAloudness range9.7 dB6.7 dB
DRdynamic range7.7 dB8.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges74.9 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz70.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor58.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time92.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz24.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination707 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.7 dB · noticeable, match 54%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −1.8 dB · small, match 75%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.0 dB · excellent, match 100%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −2.0 dB · small, match 71%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.9 dB
RMS L / R−14.8 / −13.8 dB
Peak L / R−0.8 / −0.7 dB
L/R correlation0.544
L/R delay+0.33 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−1.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −8.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −5.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −2.1 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −2.6 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −2.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −1.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +0.9 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.9 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +3.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.3 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.7 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −1.7 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −5.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −5.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.6 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +2.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.7 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −5.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −2.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −5.5 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −5.1 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.