New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000227
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 20:25
Car: Vesta sw
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 709 / 1000
Tonal balance212 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity149 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape136 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics81 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour87 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness44 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
14.4 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
90.7 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 125 Hz (up to +8.8 dB)
Strong bass excess
160 – 315 Hz (up to +7.2 dB)
Slight treble excess
5 – 8 kHz (up to +3.5 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +3.6 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +5.5 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.2 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity70.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)74.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)87.3 %
Dynamic similarity54.0 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)43.6 %
Stereo stage width100 %
Overall score709 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −4…8 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
Mid: 160 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2
High: 5 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, −2…3 dB, Q = 1.3 – 1.9
High: above 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 12 kHz)

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass and sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.450
Track start in the recording2.42 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.327
Peak sharpness (PSR)319.1
Clock drift−0.5 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−56.8 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio34.7 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.65Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.2 dB
Recording file20261109_231610.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−20.6
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−2.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−2.2 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−17.8
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−22.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB19.9 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB3.2 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB14.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges70.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz74.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor54.0 %
SPLloudness contour over time87.3 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz43.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination709 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +3.6 dB · noticeable, match 55%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +5.5 dB · noticeable, match 40%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 92%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.2 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.0 dB
RMS L / R−21.6 / −22.6 dB
Peak L / R−2.2 / −3.3 dB
L/R correlation0.878
L/R delay+0.14 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −3.3 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −2.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −0.9 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +8.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +6.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +8.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +7.3 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.5 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +0.7 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +5.6 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +7.1 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.4 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.7 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.9 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.3 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +3.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +2.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +2.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −0.9 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −4.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −9.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.