New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000117
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 09.11.2026 00:27
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 768 / 1000
Tonal balance200 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity148 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape109 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics130 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour97 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness84 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.8 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
72.3 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization91 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 5 kHz (up to −9.8 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 160 Hz (up to +6.9 dB)
Strong bass excess
200 – 315 Hz (up to +8.2 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.0 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.7 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.6 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −3.8 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity66.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)74.2 %
SPL (loudness contour)97.3 %
Dynamic similarity86.4 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)84.1 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score768 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 5 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 5 kHz)
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8
Mid: 200 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −4…8 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the highs and sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
3 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.250
Track start in the recording1.25 s
Compared segment0:45
Correlation0.522
Peak sharpness (PSR)164.1
Clock drift+14.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR91 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−16.2 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+1.9 dB
Recording file24.WAV

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−12.7
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−0.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP0.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−12.5
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−15.6 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.3 dB15.5 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.3 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB10.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance72.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges66.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz74.2 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor86.4 %
SPLloudness contour over time97.3 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz84.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination768 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.0 dB · noticeable, match 60%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.7 dB · small, match 63%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.6 dB · excellent, match 90%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −3.8 dB · noticeable, match 53%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+2.2 dB
RMS L / R−14.6 / −16.8 dB
Peak L / R−0.0 / −2.6 dB
L/R correlation0.674
L/R delay0.00 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+2.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −24.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −13.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −6.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −0.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +0.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +6.8 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.3 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.2 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +7.9 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −1.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.8 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +1.7 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +2.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +2.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity 0.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.6 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −1.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −3.4 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −3.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −4.2 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −3.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −4.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −7.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −12.6 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.