New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000281
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 10:28
Participant: LS
Car: GL8
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 701 / 1000
Tonal balance190 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity162 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape130 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics87 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour90 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness42 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.9 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
86.5 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Lack of deep bass
below 63 Hz (up to −10.8 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −17.4 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 125 Hz (up to +6.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −10.0 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.1 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.9 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity63.4 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)80.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)90.3 %
Dynamic similarity57.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)41.7 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score701 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Sub: below 63 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 63 Hz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.7
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.3 – 1.9
Mid: 630 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0

Check the crossovers and phase at 630 Hz – 1.25 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.452
Track start in the recording3.17 s
Compared segment2:11
Correlation0.492
Peak sharpness (PSR)115.3
Clock drift−31.3 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−41.3 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio25.5 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.52Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median−1.7 dB
Recording filechen ning.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−13.2
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.3 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−10.2
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−15.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB15.5 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB3.7 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB10.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance86.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges63.4 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz80.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor57.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time90.3 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz41.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination701 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −10.0 dB · significant, match 19%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.1 dB · small, match 70%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.9 dB · small, match 73%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−3.7 dB
RMS L / R−18.0 / −14.3 dB
Peak L / R−0.8 / −0.3 dB
L/R correlation0.704
L/R delay+0.05 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−3.6 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −11.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −15.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −11.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −8.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −3.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +3.9 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.3 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +0.1 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.6 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.8 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.7 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.5 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −6.4 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.9 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.7 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.5 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity 0.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −1.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.7 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −3.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −5.6 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −50.7 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.