New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000181
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 15:19
Participant: Technotuning
Car: Subaru Forester Sh
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 588 / 1000
Tonal balance206 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity125 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape65 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics64 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour91 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness37 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
13.5 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
43.2 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong treble excess
3.15 – 20 kHz (up to +18.4 dB)
Dip in the region
400 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to −5.9 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 160 Hz (up to +8.2 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −0.1 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.2 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.5 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +7.4 dB strong excess

Additional metrics

Band similarity68.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)62.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)91.0 %
Dynamic similarity42.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)36.7 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score588 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: 3.15 – 20 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 8 kHz, −5…9 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.6
Mid: 400 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 630 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8
Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: highs needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
3 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.651
Track start in the recording6.82 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.304
Peak sharpness (PSR)53.1
Clock drift+15.9 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−72.8 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio47.3 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.20Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+13.5 dB
Recording fileГолос 261109_181624.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−22.2
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−5.9 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−5.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−19.9
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−25.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB19.6 dB
LRAloudness range10.8 dB8.7 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB13.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance43.2 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges68.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz62.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor42.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time91.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz36.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination588 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −0.1 dB · excellent, match 98%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.2 dB · small, match 70%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.5 dB · small, match 77%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +7.4 dB · significant, match 29%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+3.5 dB
RMS L / R−24.2 / −27.6 dB
Peak L / R−5.9 / −8.5 dB
L/R correlation0.493
L/R delay+0.46 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+3.2 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −13.9 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −7.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −3.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +2.7 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −1.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +0.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +8.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.9 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −1.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −1.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.6 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −2.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −4.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −4.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −5.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −4.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack 0.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +1.6 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.8 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.9 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +4.1 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +4.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +5.5 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +8.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +3.8 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +4.9 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +7.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +16.8 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +17.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.