New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000045
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 07.11.2026 20:16
Car: Haval
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 591 / 1000
Tonal balance199 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity102 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape131 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics27 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour62 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness70 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
4.6 dB
(compressed)
Spectral similarity
87.6 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamics compressed
DR 4.6 vs 7.7 dB in the original
Strong bass excess
63 – 400 Hz (up to +9.3 dB)
Dip in the region
1.6 – 10 kHz (up to −8.3 dB)
Slight treble excess
10 – 16 kHz (up to +4.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.1 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +6.1 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.5 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity66.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)50.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)62.3 %
Dynamic similarity18.0 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)70.1 %
Stereo stage width118 %
Overall score591 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 63 – 400 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.6
High: 1.6 – 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 4 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.6
High: 10 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 12 kHz, −3…5 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5
Mid: 630 – 800 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 630 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.952
Track start in the recording3.93 s
Compared segment3:58
Correlation0.393
Peak sharpness (PSR)63.8
Clock drift+19.1 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−50.7 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio41.1 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.77Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+0.6 dB
Recording fileСтандартная запись 3.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−7.6
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−1.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP0.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−6.2
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−9.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB8.5 dB
LRAloudness range9.7 dB1.8 dB
DRdynamic range7.7 dB4.6 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance87.6 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges66.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz50.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor18.0 %
SPLloudness contour over time62.3 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz70.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination591 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.1 dB · noticeable, match 59%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +6.1 dB · significant, match 36%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 92%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.5 dB · small, match 78%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.5 dB
RMS L / R−9.8 / −9.3 dB
Peak L / R−1.0 / −1.0 dB
L/R correlation0.626
L/R delay+0.50 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.6 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +3.3 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −2.7 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −4.9 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −1.4 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +2.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +7.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +8.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +7.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +6.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +5.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +5.7 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +5.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −3.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +4.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +1.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +1.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −8.3 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −5.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −4.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −4.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −6.6 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −2.6 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −2.9 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.4 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +4.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −0.5 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −11.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.