New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000297
LogicVer = 1
Graham Blvd
After Dark
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:47
Date: 10.11.2026 11:45
Participant: Андрей Lepilla кустом
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 796 / 1000
Tonal balance259 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity160 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape141 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics119 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour82 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness35 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
8.9 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
94.3 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Slight bass excess
63 – 100 Hz (up to +4.8 dB)
Slight dip
125 – 200 Hz (up to −4.1 dB)
Slight treble excess
5 – 8 kHz (up to +3.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +1.7 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz 0.0 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.8 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +1.1 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity86.4 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)80.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)82.4 %
Dynamic similarity79.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)35.1 %
Stereo stage width134 %
Overall score796 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 63 – 100 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
Low: 125 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3
High: 5 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, −2…3 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3
Mid: 200 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

A dip at 125 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.351
Track start in the recording1.29 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.536
Peak sharpness (PSR)63.2
Clock drift+19.2 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−16.7 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+3.8 dB
Recording file20261110_144238.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−9.4−11.9
Peakmax sample level−0.4 dB−0.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction1.2 dBTP−0.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−6.9−9.8
RMSaverage power−11.3 dB−13.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average11.0 dB13.5 dB
LRAloudness range3.5 dB3.6 dB
DRdynamic range6.9 dB8.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance94.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges86.4 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz80.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor79.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time82.4 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz35.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination796 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +1.7 dB · small, match 75%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: 0.0 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.8 dB · excellent, match 88%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +1.1 dB · small, match 83%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance0.0 dB
RMS L / R−13.7 / −13.7 dB
Peak L / R−0.8 / −0.2 dB
L/R correlation0.556
L/R delay+0.29 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.6 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −6.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −3.0 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +2.6 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.9 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +1.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +4.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +3.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −2.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −2.7 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +2.3 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +0.6 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −2.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.5 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +2.2 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.7 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +2.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.4 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +1.5 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +3.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −2.6 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.