New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000336
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 10.11.2026 13:06
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 759 / 1000
Tonal balance229 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity168 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape71 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics126 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour95 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness70 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
47.6 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization91 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
50 – 160 Hz (up to +5.2 dB)
Slight dip
8 – 12 kHz (up to −5.0 dB)
Slight midrange boost
250 – 400 Hz (up to +4.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.5 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.2 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.9 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.4 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity76.4 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)83.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)94.7 %
Dynamic similarity83.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)69.9 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score759 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 50 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.1
High: 8 – 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +2…5 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9
Mid: 250 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9
Low: 160 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 200 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

A dip at 160 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.250
Track start in the recording2.27 s
Compared segment0:45
Correlation0.437
Peak sharpness (PSR)114.8
Clock drift+20.8 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR91 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−60.2 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio39.2 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+7.3 dB
Recording fileГолос 261110_150521.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−17.8
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−5.6 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−5.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−17.3
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−21.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.3 dB15.5 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.6 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB10.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance47.6 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges76.4 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz83.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor83.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time94.7 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz69.9 %
Overall scoreweighted combination759 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.5 dB · noticeable, match 56%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.2 dB · small, match 69%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.9 dB · excellent, match 87%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−3.4 dB
RMS L / R−23.1 / −19.7 dB
Peak L / R−8.8 / −5.6 dB
L/R correlation0.468
L/R delay+0.39 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−3.5 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −29.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −18.0 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −8.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +1.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +3.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +4.9 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.2 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −0.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.1 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +4.2 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.7 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +0.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +1.7 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +3.3 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.8 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.2 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence 0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.4 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −2.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −3.8 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +0.7 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +2.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −6.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.