New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000061
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 08.11.2026 01:30
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 636 / 1000
Tonal balance222 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity125 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape128 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics50 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour70 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness41 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.0 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
85.4 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong midrange boost
125 – 630 Hz (up to +9.4 dB)
Lack of deep bass
below 80 Hz (up to −8.8 dB)
Slight dip
2 – 5 kHz (up to −4.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −6.2 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.1 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.7 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.7 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity74.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)62.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)70.2 %
Dynamic similarity33.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)41.1 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score636 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 125 – 630 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.7
Sub: below 80 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 80 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 2 – 5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
Mid: 1 – 2 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.6 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8

Check the crossovers and phase at 2 – 5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.051
Track start in the recording1.47 s
Compared segment1:58
Correlation0.265
Peak sharpness (PSR)49.2
Clock drift+22.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−27.1 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.64Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+4.9 dB
Recording fileлоган2замер.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.5−13.5
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−0.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−0.8 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−9.9
RMSaverage power−13.8 dB−16.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.8 dB15.2 dB
LRAloudness range11.1 dB5.2 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB10.0 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance85.4 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges74.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz62.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor33.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time70.2 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz41.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination636 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −6.2 dB · significant, match 36%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.1 dB · small, match 83%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.7 dB · excellent, match 88%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.8 dB
RMS L / R−15.7 / −16.5 dB
Peak L / R−0.8 / −1.0 dB
L/R correlation−0.105
L/R delay−0.58 ms
Polarityout of phase!
Balance shift vs original+0.5 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −22.3 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −11.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −8.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −3.6 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −3.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +0.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −0.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −0.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +4.9 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +6.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +9.1 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +7.7 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +4.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +3.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.3 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −4.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −4.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.9 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −4.9 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −2.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −2.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −2.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +2.4 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +0.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −2.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −6.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.