New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000291
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 11:24
Participant: Андрей
Car: Haval f7
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 760 / 1000
Tonal balance218 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity121 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape135 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics130 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour93 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness63 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
12.4 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
90.3 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
630 Hz – 2 kHz (up to −8.2 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −8.2 dB)
Slight midrange boost
400 – 630 Hz (up to +4.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +4.0 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.2 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.6 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.3 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity72.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)60.3 %
SPL (loudness contour)93.4 %
Dynamic similarity86.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)63.0 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score760 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 630 Hz – 2 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.25 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
Mid: 400 – 630 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 500 Hz, −2…5 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
Mid: 250 – 400 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 315 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 630 Hz – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 250 – 400 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.953
Track start in the recording5.27 s
Compared segment2:10
Correlation0.544
Peak sharpness (PSR)55.6
Clock drift−39.3 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−64.8 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio39.6 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.02Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.6 dB
Recording fileЗапись 2026-11-10 at 2.18.27 PM.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.3−23.1
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−7.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−7.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−19.6
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−25.2 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB18.2 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB6.5 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB12.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges72.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz60.3 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor86.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time93.4 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz63.0 %
Overall scoreweighted combination760 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +4.0 dB · noticeable, match 52%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.2 dB · small, match 83%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.6 dB · small, match 77%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.3 dB · small, match 80%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −4.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −0.7 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +3.5 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.4 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +1.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.3 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +0.4 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.3 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids 0.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −2.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −3.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.6 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +2.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +4.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −4.2 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −7.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −3.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −7.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.3 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity 0.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −2.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +2.1 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +4.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −6.7 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −4.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −3.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.