New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000172
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 14:22
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 570 / 1000
Tonal balance172 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity121 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape94 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics43 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour73 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness67 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.7 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
62.8 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong treble excess
3.15 – 8 kHz (up to +9.3 dB)
Strong treble excess
above 10 kHz (up to +12.0 dB)
Strong sub-bass excess
below 63 Hz (up to +9.5 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +5.9 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.3 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +6.9 dB strong excess

Additional metrics

Band similarity57.4 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)60.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)73.2 %
Dynamic similarity28.6 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)66.7 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score570 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: 3.15 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 5 kHz, −4…8 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.2
High: above 10 kHz
Reduce harshness:
HSF 10 kHz, −5…10 dB, Q = 0.7
Sub: below 63 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 63 Hz, −5…9 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 250 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.25 – 1.6 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: highs, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:03.840
Track start in the recording1.45 s
Compared segment1:32
Correlation0.310
Peak sharpness (PSR)83.2
Clock drift+22.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−23.6 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.70Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+5.5 dB
Recording fileГолос 261109_172034.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.7−14.3
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB0.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP0.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−12.2
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−16.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB16.7 dB
LRAloudness range10.2 dB4.2 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB11.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance62.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges57.4 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz60.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor28.6 %
SPLloudness contour over time73.2 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz66.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination570 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +5.9 dB · noticeable, match 38%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.3 dB · small, match 69%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 92%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +6.9 dB · significant, match 32%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+3.1 dB
RMS L / R−15.4 / −18.5 dB
Peak L / R0.0 / −1.5 dB
L/R correlation0.599
L/R delay+0.42 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+2.9 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.0 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −2.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +3.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +8.6 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.5 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −1.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +3.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +6.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +0.9 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +5.8 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −3.7 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −3.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.7 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −2.3 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.9 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.8 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +1.5 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +4.5 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +7.5 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +9.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +4.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +4.5 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +6.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +12.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +3.5 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.