New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000358
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 15:22
Participant: Борис
Car: Белый Haval F7 198
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 785 / 1000
Tonal balance238 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity148 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape140 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics109 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour91 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness59 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
13.5 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
93.5 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
125 – 250 Hz (up to −5.1 dB)
Slight dip
63 – 80 Hz (up to −4.7 dB)
Slight midrange boost
800 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to +4.1 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −1.3 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −2.6 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz +1.0 dB slightly higher
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.8 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity79.2 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)74.1 %
SPL (loudness contour)90.8 %
Dynamic similarity72.4 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)59.1 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score785 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 125 – 250 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +2…5 dB, Q = 1.3 – 1.9
Low: 63 – 80 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 63 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0
Mid: 800 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 1 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5
High: 5 – 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, +2…3 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9

A dip at 125 – 250 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.252
Track start in the recording0.46 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.297
Peak sharpness (PSR)72.7
Clock drift−25.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−39.4 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: +0.07Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.1 dB
Recording filevideo_20261110_175342.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−24.4
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−7.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−7.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−20.8
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−27.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB20.3 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB6.5 dB
DRdynamic range12.3 dB13.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance93.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges79.2 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz74.1 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor72.4 %
SPLloudness contour over time90.8 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz59.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination785 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −1.3 dB · small, match 81%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −2.6 dB · small, match 65%
Bass sounds thin, lacking punch and warmth.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +1.0 dB · small, match 84%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.8 dB · excellent, match 87%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.7 dB
RMS L / R−26.6 / −28.3 dB
Peak L / R−7.1 / −9.1 dB
L/R correlation0.554
L/R delay+0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −8.1 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −5.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −1.6 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −1.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −4.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.8 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −0.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −1.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −3.6 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −4.7 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” 0.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.5 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body 0.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +4.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +1.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.9 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.8 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +1.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +1.8 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.4 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −2.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −2.7 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +3.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −1.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −3.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −2.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.