New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000173
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 09.11.2026 14:27
Participant: ...
Car: Test
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 730 / 1000
Tonal balance222 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity156 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape94 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics106 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour65 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness87 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
6.8 dB
(compressed)
Spectral similarity
62.5 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization86 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamics compressed
DR 6.8 vs 11.0 dB in the original
Strong bass excess
below 160 Hz (up to +12.2 dB)
Strong midrange boost
200 – 500 Hz (up to +9.1 dB)
Dip in the region
1.6 – 2.5 kHz (up to −5.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +2.4 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +5.9 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.2 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.3 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity74.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)77.9 %
SPL (loudness contour)65.2 %
Dynamic similarity70.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)87.5 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score730 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 160 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 160 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 200 – 500 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.2
Mid: 1.6 – 2.5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Mid: 500 – 800 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 630 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 2.5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.250
Track start in the recording0.77 s
Compared segment0:29
Correlation0.492
Peak sharpness (PSR)193.8
Clock drift−4.9 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR86 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−10.1 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median−1.2 dB
Recording fileСтандартная запись 5.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−7.3
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB0.3 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP0.3 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−7.2
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−9.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.2 dB10.1 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.1 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB6.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance62.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges74.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz77.9 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor70.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time65.2 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz87.5 %
Overall scoreweighted combination730 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +2.4 dB · small, match 67%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +5.9 dB · noticeable, match 37%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.2 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.3 dB · excellent, match 95%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.1 dB
RMS L / R−9.3 / −10.4 dB
Peak L / R−0.2 / 0.3 dB
L/R correlation0.764
L/R delay−0.07 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.0 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −7.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −5.0 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +1.6 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +3.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +2.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +2.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +9.3 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +12.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +3.5 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +6.3 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +8.5 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +4.9 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +0.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −6.5 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −1.7 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack 0.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.9 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −4.5 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.8 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.9 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −2.6 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.7 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.9 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +1.5 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −2.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −2.9 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.