New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000177
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 14:52
Participant: Blink
Car: Polo
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 792 / 1000
Tonal balance274 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity161 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape135 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics51 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour86 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness85 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
90.0 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization96 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
500 Hz – 1 kHz (up to −5.5 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 125 Hz (up to +5.5 dB)
Slight dip
1.6 – 2.5 kHz (up to −3.5 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −0.2 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.3 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.2 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity91.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)80.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)85.6 %
Dynamic similarity34.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)85.4 %
Stereo stage width135 %
Overall score792 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 500 Hz – 1 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9
Mid: 1.6 – 2.5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Mid: 200 – 250 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −2…3 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 2.5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.350
Track start in the recording3.65 s
Compared segment1:32
Correlation0.531
Peak sharpness (PSR)462.9
Clock drift−2.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR96 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−52.6 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio36.9 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.61Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+2.2 dB
Recording fileVID20261109174123.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.8−13.1
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−0.4 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−0.3 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.4−11.1
RMSaverage power−14.0 dB−15.6 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.0 dB15.2 dB
LRAloudness range10.7 dB4.9 dB
DRdynamic range8.3 dB10.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges91.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz80.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor34.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time85.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz85.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination792 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −0.2 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.3 dB · small, match 80%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.2 dB · excellent, match 97%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.9 dB
RMS L / R−15.2 / −16.1 dB
Peak L / R−0.4 / −0.6 dB
L/R correlation0.675
L/R delay+0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.7 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −9.0 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −6.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −1.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.9 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +3.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +5.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.6 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body 0.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −5.6 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.5 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +0.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −3.3 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.8 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +1.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.4 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +1.6 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +3.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −5.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −61.5 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.