New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000043
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 07.11.2026 20:15
Car: X7
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 652 / 1000
Tonal balance216 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity113 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape121 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics79 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour89 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness34 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
5.9 dB
(compressed)
Spectral similarity
80.5 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
below 100 Hz (up to +12.8 dB)
Dip in the region
1.6 – 3.15 kHz (up to −7.4 dB)
Strong midrange boost
1.25 – 1.6 kHz (up to +7.4 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +3.0 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.3 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.2 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +1.9 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity72.1 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)56.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)89.1 %
Dynamic similarity53.0 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)34.3 %
Stereo stage width119 %
Overall score652 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 100 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 100 Hz, −5…8 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 1.6 – 3.15 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2
Mid: 1.25 – 1.6 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 1.25 kHz, −4…7 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9
High: 10 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 12 kHz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 3.15 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass and sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:03.452
Track start in the recording7.19 s
Compared segment3:56
Correlation0.009
Peak sharpness (PSR)63.0
Clock drift+15.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−50.4 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio38.5 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.31Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+2.0 dB
Recording fileСтандартная запись 2.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−9.7
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−1.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP−0.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−7.4
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−11.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB10.9 dB
LRAloudness range9.2 dB6.5 dB
DRdynamic range7.7 dB5.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance80.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges72.1 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz56.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor53.0 %
SPLloudness contour over time89.1 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz34.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination652 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +3.0 dB · noticeable, match 60%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.3 dB · noticeable, match 58%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.2 dB · excellent, match 97%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +1.9 dB · small, match 73%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.9 dB
RMS L / R−11.4 / −12.3 dB
Peak L / R−1.0 / −1.0 dB
L/R correlation0.625
L/R delay+0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.7 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +3.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −1.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +2.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.1 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.0 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +12.8 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −1.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −0.4 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.9 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.8 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +3.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +1.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −6.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +6.8 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.5 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −7.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −4.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +1.8 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +6.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +2.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +5.2 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −1.2 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −14.2 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.