New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000164
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 13:35
Participant: Technotuning
Car: Subaru forester sh
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 559 / 1000
Tonal balance201 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity129 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape121 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics84 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour0 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness24 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.8 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
80.5 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
63 – 400 Hz (up to +11.0 dB)
Dip in the region
8 – 12 kHz (up to −7.9 dB)
Dip in the region
2.5 – 4 kHz (up to −5.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −1.8 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +6.4 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.7 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −2.1 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity67.1 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)64.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)0.0 %
Dynamic similarity56.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)23.6 %
Stereo stage width142 %
Overall score559 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 63 – 400 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, −5…9 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.6
High: 8 – 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3
Mid: 2.5 – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3
Mid: 800 Hz – 1 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:47.064
Track start in the recording0.25 s
Compared segment0:29
Correlation0.246
Peak sharpness (PSR)67.5
Clock drift+252.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−20.0 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+7.4 dB
Recording file20261109_163450.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.0−13.1
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB0.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP0.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.8−11.9
RMSaverage power−12.5 dB−14.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average12.5 dB15.0 dB
LRAloudness range3.2 dB1.0 dB
DRdynamic range8.6 dB9.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance80.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges67.1 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz64.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor56.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time0.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz23.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination559 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −1.8 dB · small, match 74%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +6.4 dB · significant, match 34%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −2.1 dB · small, match 71%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+3.0 dB
RMS L / R−13.7 / −16.7 dB
Peak L / R0.1 / −2.7 dB
L/R correlation0.632
L/R delay+0.50 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+2.9 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −15.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −10.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −4.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +0.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +8.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +9.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +10.8 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +6.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +7.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +9.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +3.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −4.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −3.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +2.6 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +1.8 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +2.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −4.7 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −4.6 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.4 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −5.6 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −6.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −1.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +4.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −5.2 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.