New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000204
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 09.11.2026 19:00
Participant: Андрей Lepilla кустом
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 689 / 1000
Tonal balance180 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity172 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape34 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics135 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour94 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness74 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
22.5 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization91 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Lack of deep bass
below 80 Hz (up to −24.1 dB)
Dip in the region
6.3 – 16 kHz (up to −6.1 dB)
Slight midrange boost
250 – 800 Hz (up to +3.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −17.7 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −1.3 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.9 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −2.2 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity60.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)85.9 %
SPL (loudness contour)93.6 %
Dynamic similarity89.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)73.5 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score689 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Sub: below 80 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 80 Hz, +6…7 dB, Q = 0.7
High: 6.3 – 16 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.2
Mid: 250 – 800 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 400 Hz, −2…3 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0
Low: 160 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

A dip at 160 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.351
Track start in the recording1.44 s
Compared segment0:44
Correlation0.426
Peak sharpness (PSR)70.4
Clock drift+24.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR91 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−13.5 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median−2.2 dB
Recording file20261109_215737.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−9.5
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−0.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−0.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−9.4
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−13.2 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.2 dB13.0 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.1 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB9.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance22.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges60.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz85.9 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor89.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time93.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz73.5 %
Overall scoreweighted combination689 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −17.7 dB · significant, match 5%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −1.3 dB · small, match 80%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.9 dB · excellent, match 85%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −2.2 dB · small, match 69%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−2.4 dB
RMS L / R−14.5 / −12.1 dB
Peak L / R−0.7 / −0.1 dB
L/R correlation0.410
L/R delay+0.25 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−2.5 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −37.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −35.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −25.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −10.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −3.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +0.2 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +0.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −2.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.2 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +3.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +2.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +2.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity 0.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +1.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.4 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence 0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −2.2 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −2.5 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −2.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −6.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −2.0 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −0.9 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −6.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.