New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000368
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 18:27
Participant: ЮРИЙ Ц.
Car: Vesta sw
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 841 / 1000
Tonal balance267 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity170 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape137 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics92 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour92 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness83 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
14.7 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
91.6 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
50 – 100 Hz (up to +6.8 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −7.1 dB)
Strong bass excess
200 – 315 Hz (up to +5.1 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +0.6 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.2 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.6 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity89.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)85.2 %
SPL (loudness contour)92.1 %
Dynamic similarity61.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)82.7 %
Stereo stage width133 %
Overall score841 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 50 – 100 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 63 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
Mid: 200 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Low: 125 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

A dip at 125 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.416
Track start in the recording0.25 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.583
Peak sharpness (PSR)516.3
Clock drift−3.8 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−33.5 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.53Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.1 dB
Recording file20261110_212255.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−20.5
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−2.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−2.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−17.5
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−22.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB19.7 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB3.9 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB14.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance91.6 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges89.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz85.2 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor61.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time92.1 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz82.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination841 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +0.6 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.2 dB · small, match 82%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 92%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.6 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.2 dB
RMS L / R−21.8 / −23.0 dB
Peak L / R−2.7 / −3.7 dB
L/R correlation0.793
L/R delay−0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.2 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −6.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −6.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −4.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +5.9 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +3.6 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +5.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −1.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −4.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +5.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −2.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +0.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.7 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −4.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +0.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.3 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.8 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.5 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity 0.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +2.5 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +2.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.8 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −2.0 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −4.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −9.6 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.