New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000194
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 17:05
Car: 9-3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 690 / 1000
Tonal balance211 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity123 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape130 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics89 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour91 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness46 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
14.7 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
86.3 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
800 Hz – 1.6 kHz (up to −7.9 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 125 Hz (up to +8.2 dB)
Lack of deep bass
below 63 Hz (up to −7.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −7.0 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.2 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.7 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.5 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity70.2 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)61.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)90.5 %
Dynamic similarity59.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)46.1 %
Stereo stage width116 %
Overall score690 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 800 Hz – 1.6 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.25 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.5
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
Sub: below 63 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 63 Hz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 315 – 630 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 500 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.7

Check the crossovers and phase at 800 Hz – 1.6 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.251
Track start in the recording1.23 s
Compared segment2:04
Correlation0.462
Peak sharpness (PSR)294.1
Clock drift−13.2 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−30.5 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.55Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+3.8 dB
Recording file20261109_195804.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−17.5
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−15.3
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−19.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB19.7 dB
LRAloudness range5.9 dB3.8 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB14.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance86.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges70.2 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz61.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor59.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time90.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz46.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination690 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −7.0 dB · significant, match 31%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.2 dB · small, match 69%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−1.5 dB
RMS L / R−20.6 / −19.1 dB
Peak L / R−0.1 / −0.1 dB
L/R correlation0.840
L/R delay+0.09 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−1.4 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −15.4 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −8.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −5.6 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +2.0 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +7.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −3.9 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.7 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +4.1 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +5.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.7 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −1.7 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −7.6 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −4.9 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −3.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −5.2 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence 0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.8 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.6 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −2.5 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.5 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +1.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −0.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −1.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.