New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000037
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 07.11.2026 19:24
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 786 / 1000
Tonal balance243 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity151 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape138 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics85 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour95 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness74 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.6 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
92.2 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Slight bass excess
below 160 Hz (up to +4.4 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −5.4 dB)
Slight treble excess
4 – 8 kHz (up to +4.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +3.1 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.9 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.3 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.2 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity81.1 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)75.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)94.9 %
Dynamic similarity56.6 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)73.6 %
Stereo stage width131 %
Overall score786 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 160 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 160 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 0.7
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
High: 4 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Mid: 2.5 – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, +2…3 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 160 – 250 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.553
Track start in the recording1.90 s
Compared segment3:55
Correlation0.242
Peak sharpness (PSR)78.5
Clock drift+24.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−53.2 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio37.0 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.14Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+4.6 dB
Recording file20261107_221854.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−14.0
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−0.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP−0.3 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−11.3
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−16.3 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB15.5 dB
LRAloudness range9.6 dB7.4 dB
DRdynamic range7.7 dB9.6 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance92.2 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges81.1 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz75.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor56.6 %
SPLloudness contour over time94.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz73.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination786 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +3.1 dB · noticeable, match 60%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.9 dB · small, match 73%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.3 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.2 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−3.3 dB
RMS L / R−18.2 / −14.9 dB
Peak L / R−2.0 / −0.7 dB
L/R correlation0.601
L/R delay+0.35 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−3.4 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −6.3 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −1.5 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +2.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.1 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +3.6 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +2.9 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.6 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.2 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −0.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.7 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +3.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.8 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +2.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.4 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.5 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.5 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +3.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +3.1 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +2.9 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −4.4 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −2.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −3.2 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −7.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.