New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000038
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 07.11.2026 19:28
Car: Xaval F7 , 10
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 702 / 1000
Tonal balance228 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity113 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape128 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics69 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour90 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness74 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
5.6 dB
(compressed)
Spectral similarity
85.1 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
below 100 Hz (up to +12.9 dB)
Dip in the region
1.6 – 4 kHz (up to −7.7 dB)
Strong bass excess
160 – 400 Hz (up to +7.2 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +3.2 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +4.2 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz 0.0 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.3 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity75.9 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)56.3 %
SPL (loudness contour)89.7 %
Dynamic similarity46.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)74.3 %
Stereo stage width134 %
Overall score702 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 100 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 100 Hz, −5…8 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 1.6 – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2.5 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.2
Mid: 160 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
Mid: 630 Hz – 1 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 800 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass and sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.352
Track start in the recording6.66 s
Compared segment3:57
Correlation0.458
Peak sharpness (PSR)73.1
Clock drift+19.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−57.9 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio46.4 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.36Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+2.3 dB
Recording fileСтандартная запись 1.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−9.6
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−1.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP0.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−7.2
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−11.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB10.5 dB
LRAloudness range9.4 dB6.1 dB
DRdynamic range7.6 dB5.6 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance85.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges75.9 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz56.3 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor46.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time89.7 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz74.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination702 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +3.2 dB · noticeable, match 59%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +4.2 dB · noticeable, match 50%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: 0.0 dB · excellent, match 100%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.3 dB · excellent, match 95%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.2 dB
RMS L / R−11.4 / −11.6 dB
Peak L / R−1.0 / −1.0 dB
L/R correlation0.542
L/R delay−0.19 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +3.4 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −1.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +2.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +12.9 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.2 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +1.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +3.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +6.2 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +5.7 dB
400 Hz Lower presence 0.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.3 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +5.5 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +3.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +1.4 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −5.4 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −6.7 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −4.9 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −3.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −3.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.9 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −3.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +3.5 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +4.9 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +0.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −15.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.