New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000377
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 19:32
Participant: ЮРИЙ Ц.
Car: Vesta sw
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 841 / 1000
Tonal balance280 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity167 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape139 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics104 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour93 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness58 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
14.1 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
92.9 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −7.9 dB)
Strong sub-bass excess
50 – 63 Hz (up to +5.6 dB)
Dip in the region
125 – 200 Hz (up to −6.0 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −0.5 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +0.5 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.0 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.7 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity93.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)83.6 %
SPL (loudness contour)92.7 %
Dynamic similarity69.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)58.0 %
Stereo stage width141 %
Overall score841 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
Sub: 50 – 63 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 50 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9
Low: 125 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +2…5 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5
Mid: 630 Hz – 1 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2

A dip at 125 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.555
Track start in the recording0.25 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.412
Peak sharpness (PSR)330.8
Clock drift−7.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−34.3 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.47Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+5.1 dB
Recording file20261110_222816.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−19.5
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−1.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−1.7 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−16.0
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−21.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB20.0 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB4.7 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB14.1 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance92.9 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges93.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz83.6 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor69.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time92.7 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz58.0 %
Overall scoreweighted combination841 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 93%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +0.5 dB · excellent, match 92%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.0 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.7 dB
RMS L / R−21.3 / −22.1 dB
Peak L / R−1.7 / −3.3 dB
L/R correlation0.766
L/R delay−0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −7.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −7.4 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −5.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.9 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +1.9 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +3.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +1.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −0.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −5.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +0.6 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +4.1 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +2.3 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.5 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.5 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack 0.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.6 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.4 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.1 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +2.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.7 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +2.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −0.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −4.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −5.7 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −9.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.