New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000025
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 07.11.2026 14:08
Car: Chery
Microphone: Phone + external microphone
Overall quality
Total: 574 / 1000
Tonal balance106 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity167 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape107 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics101 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour89 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness4 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
7.9 dB
(compressed)
Spectral similarity
71.1 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −63.0 dB)
Strong sub-bass excess
below 80 Hz (up to +19.9 dB)
Dip in the region
160 – 500 Hz (up to −10.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +16.8 dB strong excess
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.3 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.6 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz −24.6 dB strong dip

Additional metrics

Band similarity35.5 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)83.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)88.9 %
Dynamic similarity67.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)4.4 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score574 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +34…35 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
Sub: below 80 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 80 Hz, −8…12 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 160 – 500 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 315 Hz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.1
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −4…8 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8

Check the crossovers and phase at 1 – 1.6 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 160 – 500 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: highs, sub-bass, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:05.553
Track start in the recording7.24 s
Compared segment2:13
Correlation0.217
Peak sharpness (PSR)67.1
Clock drift+42.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.02 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−40.2 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio25.5 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.00Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.1 dB
Recording filechery Tiggo 3.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.5−14.3
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB0.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.2 dBTP0.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−10.5
RMSaverage power−13.4 dB−14.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.4 dB14.7 dB
LRAloudness range9.9 dB11.7 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB7.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance71.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges35.5 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz83.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor67.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time88.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz4.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination574 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +16.8 dB · significant, match 6%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.3 dB · noticeable, match 58%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.6 dB · small, match 76%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −24.6 dB · significant, match 2%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +3.1 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +15.7 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +19.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +13.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +8.5 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +1.0 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +7.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +7.9 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +3.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −8.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −10.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −5.8 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −6.4 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +4.4 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −3.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.7 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.8 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.5 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.1 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.5 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +3.9 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −3.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −63.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −58.7 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −52.5 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −49.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.