New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000182
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 15:25
Participant: Technotuning
Car: Помогите, я три часа уже в машине сижу 🙈
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 589 / 1000
Tonal balance218 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity129 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape101 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics46 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour88 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness7 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.6 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
67.3 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Dip in the region
400 Hz – 1.6 kHz (up to −6.6 dB)
Strong treble excess
above 10 kHz (up to +9.0 dB)
Slight treble excess
4 – 8 kHz (up to +4.7 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −2.3 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +0.5 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.5 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +3.8 dB noticeably higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity72.8 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)64.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)87.9 %
Dynamic similarity30.4 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)7.3 %
Stereo stage width129 %
Overall score589 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 400 Hz – 1.6 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.8
High: above 10 kHz
Reduce harshness:
HSF 10 kHz, −4…8 dB, Q = 0.7
High: 4 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 5 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.5
Low: 100 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: highs needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.450
Track start in the recording5.65 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.063
Peak sharpness (PSR)71.6
Clock drift−1.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−71.1 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio51.1 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.44Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+7.2 dB
Recording fileГолос 261109_182219.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−17.3
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−1.9 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−1.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−15.2
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−20.0 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB18.1 dB
LRAloudness range10.8 dB5.9 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB11.6 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance67.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges72.8 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz64.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor30.4 %
SPLloudness contour over time87.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz7.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination589 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −2.3 dB · small, match 69%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +0.5 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.5 dB · small, match 78%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +3.8 dB · noticeable, match 53%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+3.4 dB
RMS L / R−18.6 / −22.0 dB
Peak L / R−1.9 / −3.5 dB
L/R correlation0.677
L/R delay−0.04 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+3.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −16.4 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −9.0 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −4.7 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −5.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −2.3 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +7.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.5 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −1.6 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +5.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −6.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −2.5 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −4.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −5.8 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −3.9 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −3.5 dB
2 kHz Presence peak 0.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +2.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +4.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +3.8 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +2.8 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +0.3 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +4.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +8.8 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +7.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.