New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000323
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 12:42
Participant: Jcd
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 643 / 1000
Tonal balance170 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity140 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape115 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics90 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour88 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness40 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
12.2 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
76.4 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization96 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
below 200 Hz (up to +10.8 dB)
Dip in the region
400 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to −8.3 dB)
Strong treble excess
10 – 16 kHz (up to +5.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +4.4 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +6.2 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz −2.0 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +2.1 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity56.5 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)70.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)87.9 %
Dynamic similarity60.0 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)39.6 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score643 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 200 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 200 Hz, −4…8 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 400 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
High: 10 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 12 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.8 – 2.7
Mid: 250 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −2…5 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9
Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.256
Track start in the recording2.44 s
Compared segment1:52
Correlation0.401
Peak sharpness (PSR)44.9
Clock drift−104.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR96 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−52.9 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio20.3 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.29Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+18.3 dB
Recording filePXL_20261110_123840270~2.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.1−30.8
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−11.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−11.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−27.0
RMSaverage power−17.6 dB−32.6 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.6 dB21.5 dB
LRAloudness range5.9 dB4.8 dB
DRdynamic range12.1 dB12.2 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance76.4 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges56.5 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz70.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor60.0 %
SPLloudness contour over time87.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz39.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination643 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +4.4 dB · noticeable, match 48%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +6.2 dB · significant, match 36%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −2.0 dB · small, match 72%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +2.1 dB · small, match 71%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+60.7 dB
RMS L / R−29.6 / −90.3 dB
Peak L / R−11.1 / −72.7 dB
L/R correlation0.014
L/R delay0.00 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+60.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +0.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +1.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +4.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.1 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +10.0 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +8.8 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +8.2 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +4.4 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −0.1 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +4.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −5.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −5.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −5.8 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −7.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −4.2 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −4.3 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +4.9 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.6 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.9 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.9 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +0.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +0.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +5.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +5.8 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −52.1 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.