New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000158
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 10:44
Participant: Vision
Car: URV harman
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 611 / 1000
Tonal balance184 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity158 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape99 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics64 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour54 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness52 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
7.4 dB
(compressed)
Spectral similarity
65.9 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 200 Hz (up to +14.6 dB)
Strong treble excess
5 – 16 kHz (up to +8.0 dB)
Dip in the region
250 – 630 Hz (up to −7.2 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +0.1 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +8.6 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.7 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +4.5 dB noticeably higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity61.4 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)78.9 %
SPL (loudness contour)54.4 %
Dynamic similarity42.4 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)51.6 %
Stereo stage width43 %
Overall score611 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 200 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −6…11 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.7
High: 5 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 10 kHz, −5…8 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0
Mid: 250 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 400 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4

A dip at 250 – 630 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass, highs needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
3 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:07.773
Track start in the recording0.25 s
Compared segment1:55
Correlation0.131
Peak sharpness (PSR)251.5
Clock drift+0.2 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−24.9 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.72Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.6 dB
Recording fileIMG_2297.mov

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.5−11.5
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−0.3 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP0.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−8.5
RMSaverage power−13.5 dB−13.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.5 dB13.0 dB
LRAloudness range10.0 dB5.1 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB7.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance65.9 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges61.4 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz78.9 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor42.4 %
SPLloudness contour over time54.4 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz51.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination611 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +0.1 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +8.6 dB · significant, match 24%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.7 dB · small, match 76%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +4.5 dB · noticeable, match 48%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.4 dB
RMS L / R−13.6 / −13.2 dB
Peak L / R−0.6 / −0.3 dB
L/R correlation0.952
L/R delay+0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.7 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −7.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −4.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −1.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +2.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.9 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +13.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +13.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +11.2 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +6.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +0.5 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −5.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −5.4 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −6.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.9 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.7 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.4 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −3.5 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.8 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.6 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +6.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +7.7 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +7.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +7.5 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +3.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −5.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.