New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000260
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 10.11.2026 07:32
Participant: KC
Car: 君越
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 651 / 1000
Tonal balance215 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity137 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape126 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics58 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour87 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness28 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
83.8 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization57 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion
Synchronization does not cover the whole recording

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
250 – 630 Hz (up to −10.5 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 12 kHz (up to −27.6 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 125 Hz (up to +6.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.4 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.2 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.0 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.6 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity71.8 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)68.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)87.5 %
Dynamic similarity38.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)27.8 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score651 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 250 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 400 Hz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.3
High: above 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 12 kHz)
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.8 – 2.7
Mid: 2 – 2.5 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 2 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9

A dip at 250 – 630 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.751
Track start in the recording7.81 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.073
Peak sharpness (PSR)80.6
Clock drift−18.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR57 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−48.0 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio28.2 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.30Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+7.4 dB
Recording file俄语.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−16.7
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−3.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−3.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−14.5
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−19.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB16.6 dB
LRAloudness range10.8 dB6.5 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB10.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance83.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges71.8 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz68.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor38.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time87.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz27.8 %
Overall scoreweighted combination651 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.4 dB · noticeable, match 56%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.2 dB · small, match 70%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.0 dB · excellent, match 85%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.6 dB · small, match 76%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.8 dB
RMS L / R−19.4 / −20.2 dB
Peak L / R−3.1 / −3.9 dB
L/R correlation0.446
L/R delay+0.44 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.5 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −6.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −7.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −5.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −1.4 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −1.9 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −1.3 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.2 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +6.9 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +0.6 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +4.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +2.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −7.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −9.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −6.6 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −3.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.5 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +4.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.7 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +5.6 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence 0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +1.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −3.5 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −1.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.9 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.9 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −2.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −6.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −66.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.