New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000286
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 10:43
Participant: Anon
Car: Honda
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 637 / 1000
Tonal balance203 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity124 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape118 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics84 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour78 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness30 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
13.2 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
78.5 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
50 – 160 Hz (up to +14.4 dB)
Dip in the region
8 – 12 kHz (up to −12.2 dB)
Dip in the region
1.6 – 4 kHz (up to −7.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +0.3 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +7.4 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.9 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.9 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity67.8 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)62.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)77.9 %
Dynamic similarity56.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)29.6 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score637 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 50 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −6…11 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0
High: 8 – 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +5…6 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
Mid: 1.6 – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2.5 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.2
Mid: 400 – 500 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 400 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 400 – 500 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.451
Track start in the recording2.79 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.316
Peak sharpness (PSR)263.2
Clock drift+9.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−62.3 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio42.1 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.74Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+7.1 dB
Recording fileГолос 007.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−18.9
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−2.9 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−2.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−17.2
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−20.3 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB17.3 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB2.6 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB13.2 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance78.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges67.8 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz62.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor56.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time77.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz29.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination637 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +0.3 dB · excellent, match 95%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +7.4 dB · significant, match 29%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.9 dB · small, match 73%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.9 dB · small, match 73%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −7.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −9.4 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −3.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +3.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +6.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +14.0 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +13.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +7.9 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +0.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −6.6 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.8 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +2.9 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +1.3 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence 0.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.7 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −3.4 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −4.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −7.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −3.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.6 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +3.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +3.6 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −11.8 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −7.4 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +0.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +0.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −17.2 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.