New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000106
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 08.11.2026 20:10
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 738 / 1000
Tonal balance238 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity96 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape115 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics120 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour96 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness73 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
76.6 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
500 Hz – 1.6 kHz (up to −9.6 dB)
Strong midrange boost
2 – 3.15 kHz (up to +7.4 dB)
Strong treble excess
4 – 8 kHz (up to +5.2 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −2.7 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −1.1 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.1 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.9 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity79.2 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)48.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)96.2 %
Dynamic similarity80.0 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)73.2 %
Stereo stage width141 %
Overall score738 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 500 Hz – 1.6 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
Mid: 2 – 3.15 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 2.5 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
High: 4 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.7
Low: 160 – 250 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 200 Hz, +2…3 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

A dip at 160 – 250 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.453
Track start in the recording2.24 s
Compared segment3:58
Correlation0.147
Peak sharpness (PSR)87.5
Clock drift+24.8 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−55.4 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio39.8 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.03Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+1.3 dB
Recording file20261108_230006.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−12.1
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−0.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP−0.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−8.7
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−15.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB14.8 dB
LRAloudness range9.6 dB9.0 dB
DRdynamic range7.7 dB9.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance76.6 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges79.2 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz48.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor80.0 %
SPLloudness contour over time96.2 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz73.2 %
Overall scoreweighted combination738 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −2.7 dB · small, match 64%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −1.1 dB · small, match 84%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.1 dB · small, match 83%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.9 dB · excellent, match 86%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−2.2 dB
RMS L / R−16.7 / −14.6 dB
Peak L / R−0.9 / −0.7 dB
L/R correlation0.523
L/R delay+0.29 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−2.3 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.0 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −7.5 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −4.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −0.9 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −1.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −1.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −1.2 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +1.5 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −0.6 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.3 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +0.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −3.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −6.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −8.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −6.7 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.5 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +4.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +6.9 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +5.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +3.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +2.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −0.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −1.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −3.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.