New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000162
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 13:16
Car: Nissan Murano Z52
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 661 / 1000
Tonal balance229 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity136 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape138 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics58 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour94 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness6 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.8 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
91.7 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 100 Hz (up to +10.5 dB)
Strong midrange boost
630 Hz – 1.6 kHz (up to +7.1 dB)
Dip in the region
5 – 12 kHz (up to −6.0 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +0.4 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.5 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.9 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −2.2 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity76.2 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)68.1 %
SPL (loudness contour)94.0 %
Dynamic similarity38.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)6.5 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score661 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 100 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 63 Hz, −5…9 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.4
Mid: 630 Hz – 1.6 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 1 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.2
High: 5 – 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 8 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.3
Mid: 250 – 315 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 315 Hz, +5…6 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

A dip at 250 – 315 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.453
Track start in the recording8.05 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.325
Peak sharpness (PSR)52.0
Clock drift+48.5 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−50.1 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio28.7 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: +0.37Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+11.4 dB
Recording fileRepetit-Center.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−18.7
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−3.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−3.7 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−15.7
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−21.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB17.7 dB
LRAloudness range10.9 dB14.5 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB10.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance91.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges76.2 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz68.1 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor38.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time94.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz6.5 %
Overall scoreweighted combination661 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.5 dB · noticeable, match 56%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.9 dB · excellent, match 86%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −2.2 dB · small, match 69%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −11.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −11.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −3.9 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.7 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +10.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +7.0 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +1.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −0.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +3.5 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.8 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −4.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −2.2 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.6 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +2.8 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +1.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +7.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +4.6 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +3.6 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.2 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −3.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −2.7 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −4.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −1.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −3.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −59.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.