New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000115
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 09.11.2026 00:25
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 781 / 1000
Tonal balance195 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity163 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape101 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics139 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour97 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness86 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.4 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
67.7 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization91 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 5 kHz (up to −11.3 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 160 Hz (up to +6.4 dB)
Strong bass excess
200 – 315 Hz (up to +7.7 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.9 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.1 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −4.7 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity65.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)81.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)97.3 %
Dynamic similarity92.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)85.5 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score781 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 5 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 5 kHz)
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −4…6 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Mid: 200 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9
Mid: 315 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 500 Hz, +2…3 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 315 – 630 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the highs and sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.250
Track start in the recording1.38 s
Compared segment0:45
Correlation0.219
Peak sharpness (PSR)169.6
Clock drift+15.5 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR91 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−15.4 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+0.8 dB
Recording file20.WAV

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−11.8
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−0.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−0.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−11.5
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−14.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.3 dB14.7 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.3 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB10.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance67.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges65.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz81.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor92.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time97.3 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz85.5 %
Overall scoreweighted combination781 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.9 dB · noticeable, match 52%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.1 dB · small, match 70%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.5 dB · excellent, match 92%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −4.7 dB · noticeable, match 45%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.9 dB
RMS L / R−13.9 / −15.9 dB
Peak L / R−0.1 / −2.2 dB
L/R correlation0.703
L/R delay+0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −25.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −14.7 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −6.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −0.9 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −1.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth 0.0 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +6.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +0.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.6 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +7.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −2.4 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +1.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +1.7 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +2.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.8 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.5 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence 0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −4.7 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −6.2 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −5.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −7.0 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −9.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −14.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.