New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000050
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 07.11.2026 23:52
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 688 / 1000
Tonal balance193 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity140 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape140 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics53 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour88 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness74 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.9 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
93.5 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
80 – 160 Hz (up to +7.5 dB)
Strong bass excess
200 – 315 Hz (up to +8.9 dB)
Slight dip
4 – 10 kHz (up to −4.4 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.1 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +4.1 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.7 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −3.2 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity64.5 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)70.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)87.5 %
Dynamic similarity35.4 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)74.0 %
Stereo stage width139 %
Overall score688 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.6
Mid: 200 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −5…9 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
High: 4 – 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
High: above 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 12 kHz)

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass, highs, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.651
Track start in the recording2.12 s
Compared segment2:02
Correlation0.615
Peak sharpness (PSR)98.0
Clock drift+14.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−59.8 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio39.3 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.38Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.9 dB
Recording fileгромк14.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.5−18.1
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−2.9 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−2.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−15.2
RMSaverage power−13.6 dB−20.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.6 dB17.6 dB
LRAloudness range10.9 dB6.7 dB
DRdynamic range8.3 dB10.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance93.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges64.5 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz70.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor35.4 %
SPLloudness contour over time87.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz74.0 %
Overall scoreweighted combination688 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.1 dB · noticeable, match 60%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +4.1 dB · noticeable, match 50%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −3.2 dB · noticeable, match 58%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−1.9 dB
RMS L / R−21.5 / −19.6 dB
Peak L / R−3.5 / −2.9 dB
L/R correlation0.584
L/R delay−0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−2.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −18.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −11.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −7.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.9 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +0.5 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +2.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +7.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +6.9 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +2.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +5.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +8.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body 0.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.4 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +2.2 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +3.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +2.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −3.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.8 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −3.8 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −3.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −3.7 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.4 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −2.2 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −6.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −10.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.