New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000065
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 08.11.2026 06:42
Car: Honda cr-v. Система 3way.
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 513 / 1000
Tonal balance112 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity71 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape96 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics129 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour96 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness9 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
8.1 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
63.8 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Lack of deep bass
below 125 Hz (up to −28.2 dB)
Dip in the region
1.25 – 6.3 kHz (up to −14.1 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −23.1 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −25.6 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −4.8 dB reduced
Mids 250–4 kHz −2.1 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz −6.7 dB strong dip

Additional metrics

Band similarity37.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)35.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)95.6 %
Dynamic similarity86.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)9.5 %
Stereo stage width134 %
Overall score513 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 125 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 125 Hz, +9…10 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 1.25 – 6.3 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2.5 kHz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.7
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +8…9 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
Low: 125 – 315 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 200 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.3

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, highs, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.651
Track start in the recording6.03 s
Compared segment3:58
Correlation0.268
Peak sharpness (PSR)75.6
Clock drift+10.5 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−56.5 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio40.6 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.07Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+3.3 dB
Recording file8 нояб., 14.37​.mp3

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−13.0
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−2.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP−1.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−9.6
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−15.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB13.9 dB
LRAloudness range9.5 dB9.0 dB
DRdynamic range7.7 dB8.1 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance63.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges37.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz35.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor86.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time95.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz9.5 %
Overall scoreweighted combination513 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −25.6 dB · significant, match 1%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −4.8 dB · noticeable, match 45%
Bass sounds thin, lacking punch and warmth.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −2.1 dB · small, match 70%
Vocals and instruments may sound distant, “recessed”.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −6.7 dB · significant, match 33%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.5 dB
RMS L / R−15.6 / −16.1 dB
Peak L / R−2.0 / −2.1 dB
L/R correlation0.542
L/R delay−0.29 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.3 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −24.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −27.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −29.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −21.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −18.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −9.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −5.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −2.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +3.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +3.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +6.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +3.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body 0.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +2.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +3.8 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −2.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −6.7 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −11.7 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −12.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −7.7 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −2.2 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −5.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +0.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −22.8 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −9.7 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −8.8 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −19.7 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.