New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000314
LogicVer = 1
IOWA
Простая песня
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:24
Date: 10.11.2026 12:20
Participant: Евгений
Car: Л9
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 732 / 1000
Tonal balance238 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity168 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape130 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics58 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour96 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness42 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
12.9 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
86.4 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Slight bass excess
80 – 200 Hz (up to +4.8 dB)
Slight dip
630 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to −4.2 dB)
Slight bass excess
50 – 80 Hz (up to +4.5 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −2.4 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.8 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.2 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity79.4 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)83.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)96.0 %
Dynamic similarity39.0 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)42.2 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score732 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 80 – 200 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
Mid: 630 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.6
Low: 50 – 80 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 63 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5
High: 4 – 5 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 4 kHz, +2…3 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

Check the crossovers and phase at 4 – 5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.251
Track start in the recording0.49 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.503
Peak sharpness (PSR)246.2
Clock drift+9.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−31.7 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.30Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.3 dB
Recording file20261110_141933.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−19.5
Peakmax sample level−0.6 dB−2.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction−0.5 dBTP−2.2 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.0−16.6
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−22.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.1 dB20.3 dB
LRAloudness range8.7 dB6.6 dB
DRdynamic range7.2 dB12.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance86.4 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges79.4 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz83.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor39.0 %
SPLloudness contour over time96.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz42.2 %
Overall scoreweighted combination732 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −2.4 dB · small, match 67%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.8 dB · small, match 63%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.2 dB · excellent, match 97%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.5 dB
RMS L / R−22.3 / −22.8 dB
Peak L / R−4.5 / −2.2 dB
L/R correlation0.509
L/R delay−0.23 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.4 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −10.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −10.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −5.6 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.3 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +2.5 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.7 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −2.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +0.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.3 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −3.7 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +1.7 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence 0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −2.8 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance 0.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −0.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +1.5 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −5.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.