New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000318
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 12:29
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 723 / 1000
Tonal balance246 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity155 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape130 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics87 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour95 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness10 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
14.0 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
86.9 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
50 – 125 Hz (up to +5.2 dB)
Dip in the region
8 – 12 kHz (up to −5.6 dB)
Strong treble excess
12 – 16 kHz (up to +6.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −2.3 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.7 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.5 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity81.9 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)77.6 %
SPL (loudness contour)95.2 %
Dynamic similarity57.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)10.0 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score723 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 50 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0
High: 8 – 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9
High: 12 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 16 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
Mid: 630 – 800 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

Check the crossovers and phase at 2 – 2.5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 160 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.453
Track start in the recording2.91 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.512
Peak sharpness (PSR)105.8
Clock drift+47.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−61.1 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio37.5 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.32Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+7.1 dB
Recording fileГолос 261110_142552.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−21.5
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−2.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−2.2 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−18.5
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−23.6 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB21.5 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB4.4 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB14.0 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance86.9 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges81.9 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz77.6 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor57.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time95.2 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz10.0 %
Overall scoreweighted combination723 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −2.3 dB · small, match 68%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.7 dB · small, match 76%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 93%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.5 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−2.7 dB
RMS L / R−25.2 / −22.5 dB
Peak L / R−6.5 / −2.2 dB
L/R correlation0.553
L/R delay+0.25 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−2.7 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −9.3 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −14.7 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −7.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +2.6 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +4.8 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.8 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −0.1 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.9 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −1.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.4 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −4.8 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.8 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +0.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +2.6 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −3.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.9 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +2.6 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −3.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −4.5 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +1.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +5.6 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −4.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.