New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000273
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 09:14
Participant: Antohin89
Car: VW Touareg FL
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 566 / 1000
Tonal balance135 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity85 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape123 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics90 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour71 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness62 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.3 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
82.0 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 250 Hz (up to +17.4 dB)
Dip in the region
1 – 3.15 kHz (up to −14.2 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 6.3 kHz (up to −8.7 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +7.5 dB strong excess
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +11.7 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz −2.0 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz −2.6 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity44.9 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)42.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)70.7 %
Dynamic similarity60.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)62.5 %
Stereo stage width86 %
Overall score566 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 250 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −7…12 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.6
Mid: 1 – 3.15 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2 kHz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.1
High: above 6.3 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 6.3 kHz)
Mid: 630 Hz – 1 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 800 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

Check the crossovers and phase at 1 – 3.15 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.451
Track start in the recording2.01 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.043
Peak sharpness (PSR)112.9
Clock drift−10.9 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−53.7 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio36.3 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.89Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.5 dB
Recording fileIMG_0012.mov

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−16.2
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.7 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−14.0
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−17.3 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB16.6 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB3.4 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB11.3 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance82.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges44.9 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz42.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor60.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time70.7 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz62.5 %
Overall scoreweighted combination566 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +7.5 dB · significant, match 29%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +11.7 dB · significant, match 14%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −2.0 dB · small, match 72%
Vocals and instruments may sound distant, “recessed”.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −2.6 dB · small, match 65%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.5 dB
RMS L / R−17.6 / −17.1 dB
Peak L / R−0.8 / −0.7 dB
L/R correlation0.906
L/R delay−0.07 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.5 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −0.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −1.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +5.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +9.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +12.6 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +12.0 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +17.3 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +14.5 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +10.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +3.8 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.7 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −2.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility 0.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +5.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +2.6 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −5.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −9.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −14.8 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −3.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +2.5 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −1.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −3.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −3.8 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −7.5 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −6.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −12.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.