New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000363
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 10.11.2026 17:14
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 623 / 1000
Tonal balance206 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity155 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape87 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics105 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour0 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness70 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.8 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
58.2 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
63 – 200 Hz (up to +6.0 dB)
Strong sub-bass excess
below 50 Hz (up to +7.0 dB)
Slight dip
200 – 400 Hz (up to −3.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +5.7 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.2 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.3 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.1 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity68.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)77.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)0.0 %
Dynamic similarity70.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)70.0 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score623 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 63 – 200 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0
Sub: below 50 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 50 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 200 – 400 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 250 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.3 – 1.9
High: 5 – 6.3 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, +2…3 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

A dip at 200 – 400 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass and mid-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:20.169
Track start in the recording0.25 s
Compared segment0:25
Correlation0.525
Peak sharpness (PSR)87.2
Clock drift+18.3 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−20.3 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.4 dB
Recording file20261110_162243.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−17.1
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−1.6 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−1.5 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−16.9
RMSaverage power−14.6 dB−19.6 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.3 dB18.1 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.3 dB
DRdynamic range11.1 dB9.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance58.2 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges68.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz77.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor70.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time0.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz70.0 %
Overall scoreweighted combination623 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +5.7 dB · noticeable, match 39%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.2 dB · noticeable, match 58%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.3 dB · excellent, match 95%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.1 dB · small, match 83%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.2 dB
RMS L / R−19.5 / −19.7 dB
Peak L / R−1.6 / −6.2 dB
L/R correlation0.630
L/R delay+0.09 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.2 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −8.0 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −3.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +6.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +5.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +2.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +4.3 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +3.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +5.9 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +3.4 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −3.7 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −3.8 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +3.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +3.3 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +1.2 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +2.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.4 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.9 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.3 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −3.2 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −2.2 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −2.7 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +1.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −1.2 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −3.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.