New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000198
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 17:47
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 686 / 1000
Tonal balance205 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity124 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape116 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics64 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour94 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness83 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
12.3 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
77.1 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong treble excess
3.15 – 10 kHz (up to +6.8 dB)
Dip in the region
125 – 200 Hz (up to −9.0 dB)
Dip in the region
250 – 630 Hz (up to −5.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.9 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −1.5 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +4.0 dB noticeably higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity68.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)62.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)93.7 %
Dynamic similarity42.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)82.7 %
Stereo stage width134 %
Overall score686 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: 3.15 – 10 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
Low: 125 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +4…5 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Mid: 250 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 400 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.6
Mid: 1 – 1.6 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 1.25 kHz, −2…3 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 2.5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 125 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the highs and sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.551
Track start in the recording3.38 s
Compared segment2:01
Correlation0.634
Peak sharpness (PSR)90.8
Clock drift+15.2 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−55.6 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio33.9 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.14Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.0 dB
Recording filevideo_20261109_213741.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−18.1
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−1.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−1.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−15.4
RMSaverage power−13.8 dB−21.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.8 dB19.9 dB
LRAloudness range10.9 dB8.9 dB
DRdynamic range8.3 dB12.3 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance77.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges68.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz62.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor42.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time93.7 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz82.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination686 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.9 dB · noticeable, match 52%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −1.5 dB · small, match 78%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 92%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +4.0 dB · noticeable, match 51%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−1.0 dB
RMS L / R−22.2 / −21.2 dB
Peak L / R−4.9 / −1.8 dB
L/R correlation0.609
L/R delay0.00 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−1.3 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −20.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −11.0 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −7.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −0.6 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.8 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −1.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +0.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −0.9 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −5.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.9 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +2.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −4.8 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −2.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +1.2 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +2.7 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +2.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.8 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −3.6 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence 0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +5.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +6.9 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +4.8 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +6.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +4.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +1.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −1.6 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −3.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.