New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000013
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 07.11.2026 09:28
Car: Haval f7
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 578 / 1000
Tonal balance170 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity128 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape135 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics65 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour74 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness6 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.4 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
90.1 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 6.3 kHz (up to −18.5 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 125 Hz (up to +10.2 dB)
Dip in the region
800 Hz – 2.5 kHz (up to −6.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.5 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +4.7 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.3 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz −5.0 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity56.5 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)64.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)73.9 %
Dynamic similarity43.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)6.4 %
Stereo stage width104 %
Overall score578 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 6.3 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 6.3 kHz)
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −6…10 dB, Q = 1.3 – 1.9
Mid: 800 Hz – 2.5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.6 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
Mid: 160 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.6

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: highs, mid-bass, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.281
Track start in the recording2.15 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.458
Peak sharpness (PSR)43.2
Clock drift−3.1 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−47.1 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio27.5 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.56Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.5 dB
Recording fileГармоника фон.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.5−17.7
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−2.5 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−2.5 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−14.0
RMSaverage power−13.6 dB−19.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.6 dB17.1 dB
LRAloudness range10.9 dB7.6 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB10.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges56.5 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz64.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor43.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time73.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz6.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination578 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.5 dB · noticeable, match 56%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +4.7 dB · noticeable, match 45%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.3 dB · small, match 81%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −5.0 dB · noticeable, match 43%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.5 dB
RMS L / R−19.0 / −20.5 dB
Peak L / R−2.5 / −3.4 dB
L/R correlation0.749
L/R delay−0.19 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.2 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −10.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −10.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −7.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −1.5 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +7.0 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +10.2 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +8.2 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +2.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +2.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.6 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body 0.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +2.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −1.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −5.6 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −2.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −4.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −5.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.3 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.9 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −3.8 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −4.8 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −5.9 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −8.5 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −13.2 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −57.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.