New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000375
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 19:24
Participant: Андрей Lepilla кустом
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 831 / 1000
Tonal balance247 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity163 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape139 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics120 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour96 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness66 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
12.4 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
92.8 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Slight sub-bass excess
below 80 Hz (up to +4.0 dB)
Slight treble excess
4 – 6.3 kHz (up to +4.4 dB)
Slight bass excess
100 – 160 Hz (up to +4.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +1.6 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.2 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.3 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +1.7 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity82.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)81.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)95.6 %
Dynamic similarity79.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)66.5 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score831 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 80 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 80 Hz, −2…3 dB, Q = 0.7
High: 4 – 6.3 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 5 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
Low: 100 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Low: 200 – 250 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 200 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

A dip at 200 – 250 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.452
Track start in the recording0.95 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.429
Peak sharpness (PSR)66.7
Clock drift+28.9 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−29.7 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.33Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+1.9 dB
Recording file20261110_222109.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−16.7
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.9 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−13.9
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−18.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB17.9 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB4.5 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB12.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance92.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges82.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz81.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor79.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time95.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz66.5 %
Overall scoreweighted combination831 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +1.6 dB · small, match 77%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.2 dB · small, match 82%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.3 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +1.7 dB · small, match 75%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.0 dB
RMS L / R−18.8 / −18.7 dB
Peak L / R−0.9 / −0.9 dB
L/R correlation0.547
L/R delay+0.36 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original0.0 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −4.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −3.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +1.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +1.9 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +3.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +2.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +1.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +0.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −5.7 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +0.9 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −2.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −1.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +1.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.4 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +3.8 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.8 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer 0.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +3.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +2.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −1.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.