New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000379
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 19:42
Participant: ЮРИЙ Ц.
Car: Vesta sw
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 862 / 1000
Tonal balance277 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity167 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape140 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics110 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour94 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness74 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
13.8 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
93.4 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −8.2 dB)
Strong sub-bass excess
50 – 63 Hz (up to +5.5 dB)
Dip in the region
125 – 200 Hz (up to −5.1 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −0.6 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +0.4 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.2 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.7 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity92.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)83.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)93.7 %
Dynamic similarity73.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)74.1 %
Stereo stage width143 %
Overall score862 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
Sub: 50 – 63 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 50 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9
Low: 125 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9
Mid: 800 Hz – 1 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +2…3 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

A dip at 125 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds very close to the original. No significant correction is needed, only fine-tuning by ear.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.873
Track start in the recording0.25 s
Compared segment2:11
Correlation0.635
Peak sharpness (PSR)339.1
Clock drift−4.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−33.3 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.42Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+4.8 dB
Recording file20261110_223805.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−19.4
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−2.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−2.2 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.6−16.1
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−21.6 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB19.5 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB4.8 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB13.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance93.4 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges92.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz83.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor73.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time93.7 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz74.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination862 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −0.6 dB · excellent, match 90%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.2 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.8 dB
RMS L / R−21.3 / −22.1 dB
Peak L / R−2.2 / −3.4 dB
L/R correlation0.756
L/R delay0.00 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −7.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −7.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −6.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +1.7 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +3.4 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +1.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +0.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −4.5 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −1.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.8 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +2.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −3.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.8 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.5 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +2.5 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.5 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +0.9 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +0.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −3.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −6.6 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −9.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.