New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000330
LogicVer = 1
IOWA
Простая песня
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:24
Date: 10.11.2026 12:52
Participant: V
Car: URV
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 602 / 1000
Tonal balance203 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity110 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape89 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics88 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour90 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness22 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
59.3 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong bass excess
40 – 160 Hz (up to +12.8 dB)
Dip in the region
2 – 5 kHz (up to −7.7 dB)
Strong treble excess
8 – 16 kHz (up to +5.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +2.4 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +6.1 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.3 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.9 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity67.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)54.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)90.2 %
Dynamic similarity58.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)21.6 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score602 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −5…10 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
Mid: 2 – 5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
High: 8 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 12 kHz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
Mid: 200 – 250 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 250 Hz, +4…5 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 2 – 5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 200 – 250 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:09.245
Track start in the recording0.25 s
Compared segment1:29
Correlation0.303
Peak sharpness (PSR)116.8
Clock drift−21.1 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−32.8 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.06Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.4 dB
Recording fileIMG_2310.mov

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.8−17.0
Peakmax sample level−0.6 dB−1.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction−0.5 dBTP−1.2 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.6−13.0
RMSaverage power−14.1 dB−19.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.5 dB18.2 dB
LRAloudness range7.7 dB8.6 dB
DRdynamic range7.8 dB11.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance59.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges67.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz54.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor58.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time90.2 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz21.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination602 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +2.4 dB · small, match 67%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +6.1 dB · significant, match 36%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.3 dB · small, match 81%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.9 dB · excellent, match 86%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.6 dB
RMS L / R−19.7 / −19.1 dB
Peak L / R−1.8 / −1.2 dB
L/R correlation0.606
L/R delay+0.35 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−1.7 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +3.9 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −5.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +0.7 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +7.6 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +12.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +11.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +7.2 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +0.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.6 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −8.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.9 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.8 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −7.8 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +4.5 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +3.8 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +2.8 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +2.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −3.8 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −5.9 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −4.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −6.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance 0.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −1.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +2.6 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +5.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.0 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +3.5 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −3.9 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.