New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000317
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 12:27
Participant: Gr
Car: Rapid
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 616 / 1000
Tonal balance191 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity137 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape123 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics79 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour79 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness7 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.7 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
82.3 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
50 – 160 Hz (up to +12.4 dB)
Strong midrange boost
200 – 630 Hz (up to +6.7 dB)
Dip in the region
630 Hz – 2 kHz (up to −5.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −4.5 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +7.5 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.7 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.6 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity63.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)68.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)79.4 %
Dynamic similarity52.4 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)7.3 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score616 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 50 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −6…12 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0
Mid: 200 – 630 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 400 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.2
Mid: 630 Hz – 2 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.25 kHz, +2…5 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.1
High: 5 – 6.3 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, +2…3 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 630 Hz – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.350
Track start in the recording1.87 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.089
Peak sharpness (PSR)80.4
Clock drift0.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−48.3 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio33.0 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.71Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+3.1 dB
Recording fileIMG_7834.mov

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−13.6
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.6 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−11.6
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−15.3 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB14.7 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB3.5 dB
DRdynamic range12.3 dB9.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance82.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges63.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz68.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor52.4 %
SPLloudness contour over time79.4 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz7.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination616 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −4.5 dB · noticeable, match 47%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +7.5 dB · significant, match 28%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.6 dB · excellent, match 90%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+5.1 dB
RMS L / R−13.4 / −18.5 dB
Peak L / R−0.6 / −0.9 dB
L/R correlation0.857
L/R delay+0.27 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+5.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −1.4 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −11.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −10.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +1.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +8.0 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +11.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +12.4 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +10.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +4.3 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −1.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +5.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +6.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +6.5 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +5.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −4.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −4.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −3.7 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.3 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +1.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.5 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.5 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −3.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +0.5 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +0.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +1.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −2.9 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.