New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000049
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 07.11.2026 23:47
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 677 / 1000
Tonal balance188 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity148 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape141 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics46 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour84 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness70 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.8 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
94.0 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 4 kHz (up to −10.0 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 160 Hz (up to +7.3 dB)
Strong bass excess
200 – 315 Hz (up to +8.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.4 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.9 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −4.2 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity62.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)73.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)83.9 %
Dynamic similarity30.4 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)69.9 %
Stereo stage width138 %
Overall score677 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 4 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 4 kHz)
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.7
Mid: 200 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −5…9 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Mid: 1.6 – 2 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2 kHz, +2…5 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: highs, mid-bass, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.451
Track start in the recording2.12 s
Compared segment2:01
Correlation0.131
Peak sharpness (PSR)95.4
Clock drift+17.2 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−60.8 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio40.8 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.46Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.1 dB
Recording fileгромк16.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.5−17.6
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−2.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−2.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−14.0
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−19.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB17.8 dB
LRAloudness range11.0 dB5.9 dB
DRdynamic range8.3 dB10.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance94.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges62.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz73.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor30.4 %
SPLloudness contour over time83.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz69.9 %
Overall scoreweighted combination677 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.4 dB · noticeable, match 57%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.9 dB · noticeable, match 52%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.5 dB · excellent, match 92%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −4.2 dB · noticeable, match 50%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−1.9 dB
RMS L / R−21.0 / −19.1 dB
Peak L / R−2.9 / −2.1 dB
L/R correlation0.596
L/R delay−0.04 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−2.2 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −18.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −11.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −7.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +0.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +1.8 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +7.2 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +6.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +2.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +5.7 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +8.1 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +2.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +2.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +2.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.8 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity 0.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.9 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −3.2 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −4.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −5.7 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −4.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −3.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −7.9 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −11.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.