New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000339
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 10.11.2026 13:22
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 543 / 1000
Tonal balance167 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity160 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape53 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics121 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour28 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness14 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.1 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
35.6 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization91 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
below 160 Hz (up to +17.4 dB)
Strong treble excess
12 – 16 kHz (up to +6.6 dB)
Slight midrange boost
250 – 400 Hz (up to +4.4 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +13.0 dB strong excess
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +5.4 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +1.5 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity55.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)79.9 %
SPL (loudness contour)28.3 %
Dynamic similarity80.6 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)13.8 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score543 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 160 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 160 Hz, −7…12 dB, Q = 0.7
High: 12 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 16 kHz, −4…7 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
Mid: 250 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
High: 5 – 6.3 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 5 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.251
Track start in the recording1.75 s
Compared segment0:45
Correlation0.404
Peak sharpness (PSR)89.5
Clock drift+57.2 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR91 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−52.0 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio33.5 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+10.4 dB
Recording fileГолос 261110_152015.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−17.4
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−2.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−2.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−16.9
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−18.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.3 dB15.8 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.6 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB10.1 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance35.6 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges55.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz79.9 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor80.6 %
SPLloudness contour over time28.3 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz13.8 %
Overall scoreweighted combination543 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +13.0 dB · significant, match 11%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +5.4 dB · noticeable, match 41%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.5 dB · excellent, match 92%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +1.5 dB · small, match 78%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−5.1 dB
RMS L / R−21.7 / −16.6 dB
Peak L / R−7.3 / −2.7 dB
L/R correlation0.633
L/R delay−0.95 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−5.2 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −15.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −2.6 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +8.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +17.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +15.0 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +9.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.2 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.3 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −1.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +2.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +4.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +2.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.2 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.3 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −2.3 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.3 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.2 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +3.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.7 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.5 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +4.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +4.2 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −7.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.