New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000163
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 13:32
Participant: Technotuning
Car: Subaru Forester sh
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 566 / 1000
Tonal balance184 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity126 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape125 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics36 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour56 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness39 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.6 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
83.4 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
below 200 Hz (up to +11.5 dB)
Strong midrange boost
200 – 400 Hz (up to +8.3 dB)
Dip in the region
500 Hz – 1 kHz (up to −6.5 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +5.9 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +6.4 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.8 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.8 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity61.5 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)62.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)56.0 %
Dynamic similarity24.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)38.7 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score566 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 200 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 200 Hz, −5…9 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 200 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.5
Mid: 500 Hz – 1 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 630 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.7
Mid: 1 – 2 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 1.6 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:05.385
Track start in the recording0.85 s
Compared segment0:56
Correlation0.434
Peak sharpness (PSR)78.9
Clock drift+33.9 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−19.9 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.87Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+3.8 dB
Recording file20261109_163041.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−13.0−12.1
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB0.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP0.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−9.0−10.8
RMSaverage power−15.8 dB−14.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average15.8 dB14.1 dB
LRAloudness range9.6 dB2.0 dB
DRdynamic range8.5 dB9.6 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance83.4 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges61.5 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz62.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor24.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time56.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz38.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination566 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +5.9 dB · noticeable, match 37%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +6.4 dB · significant, match 34%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.8 dB · excellent, match 87%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.8 dB · excellent, match 87%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+2.8 dB
RMS L / R−12.9 / −15.7 dB
Peak L / R0.1 / −1.3 dB
L/R correlation0.696
L/R delay+0.17 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+2.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −8.9 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −2.0 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +3.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +8.6 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.8 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +5.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +8.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +11.5 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +5.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +5.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +7.9 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +3.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −1.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −3.7 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −6.2 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +5.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +6.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +1.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −3.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.5 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.4 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.6 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −5.8 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −1.2 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +4.7 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −2.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.