New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000225
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 20:18
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 771 / 1000
Tonal balance258 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity132 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape133 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics98 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour96 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness54 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
14.9 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
88.9 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Slight midrange boost
630 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to +3.8 dB)
Dip in the region
125 – 200 Hz (up to −7.0 dB)
Slight dip
315 – 630 Hz (up to −4.5 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −2.5 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −0.4 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.4 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity86.1 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)66.2 %
SPL (loudness contour)96.4 %
Dynamic similarity65.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)54.4 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score771 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 630 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 1 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.6
Low: 125 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +4…6 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Mid: 315 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 400 Hz, +2…3 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.6
High: 3.15 – 6.3 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 5 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3

A dip at 125 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.451
Track start in the recording1.74 s
Compared segment2:03
Correlation0.527
Peak sharpness (PSR)118.0
Clock drift+18.3 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−61.4 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio35.0 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.02Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.9 dB
Recording filevideo_20261109_235431.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.3−23.7
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−4.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−4.2 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−19.6
RMSaverage power−17.7 dB−26.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.7 dB22.2 dB
LRAloudness range5.9 dB6.3 dB
DRdynamic range12.1 dB14.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance88.9 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges86.1 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz66.2 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor65.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time96.4 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz54.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination771 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −2.5 dB · small, match 66%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.5 dB · excellent, match 92%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.4 dB · excellent, match 93%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−2.1 dB
RMS L / R−27.6 / −25.5 dB
Peak L / R−7.2 / −4.2 dB
L/R correlation0.207
L/R delay+0.59 ms
Polarityout of phase!
Balance shift vs original−2.0 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.0 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −8.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −5.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −0.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +0.4 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −0.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −6.9 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +0.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +4.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −4.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −2.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −1.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +3.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +3.2 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +3.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.4 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.5 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +3.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +2.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +3.5 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +0.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −0.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −3.8 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −7.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.