New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000105
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 08.11.2026 19:47
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 631 / 1000
Tonal balance243 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity116 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape12 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics128 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour60 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness72 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.7 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
7.7 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization91 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
500 Hz – 2 kHz (up to −13.1 dB)
Dip in the region
8 – 16 kHz (up to −5.2 dB)
Slight dip
160 – 200 Hz (up to −3.7 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −1.4 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −0.6 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz −2.6 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.6 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity81.1 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)57.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)60.3 %
Dynamic similarity85.6 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)72.1 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score631 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 500 Hz – 2 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.8
High: 8 – 16 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Low: 160 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 200 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0
Mid: 2.5 – 3.15 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

A dip at 160 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.251
Track start in the recording0.87 s
Compared segment0:44
Correlation0.407
Peak sharpness (PSR)74.0
Clock drift+26.8 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR91 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−17.4 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+1.0 dB
Recording file20261108_224240.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−12.9
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−1.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−1.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−12.2
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−16.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.2 dB15.9 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.2 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB10.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance7.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges81.1 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz57.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor85.6 %
SPLloudness contour over time60.3 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz72.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination631 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −1.4 dB · small, match 79%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −0.6 dB · excellent, match 90%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −2.6 dB · small, match 65%
Vocals and instruments may sound distant, “recessed”.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.6 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−3.5 dB
RMS L / R−19.0 / −15.5 dB
Peak L / R−4.9 / −1.0 dB
L/R correlation0.455
L/R delay+0.27 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−3.6 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −6.5 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −2.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −0.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.8 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +0.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +1.4 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.5 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −2.9 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.2 dB
400 Hz Lower presence 0.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −3.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −5.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −9.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −8.2 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −7.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −3.9 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +3.2 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.9 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.5 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.1 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +0.2 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −4.9 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −1.5 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −1.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −5.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.