New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000196
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 17:28
Car: 9-3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 791 / 1000
Tonal balance250 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity163 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape136 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics87 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour93 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness62 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
15.4 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
90.8 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Lack of deep bass
below 63 Hz (up to −6.4 dB)
Dip in the region
1 – 1.25 kHz (up to −5.1 dB)
Slight midrange boost
315 – 400 Hz (up to +4.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −5.6 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −0.1 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.2 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.1 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity83.4 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)81.3 %
SPL (loudness contour)93.4 %
Dynamic similarity58.0 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)62.3 %
Stereo stage width145 %
Overall score791 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Sub: below 63 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 63 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 1 – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
Mid: 315 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 400 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
Low: 100 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

Check the crossovers and phase at 1 – 1.25 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.451
Track start in the recording1.33 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.526
Peak sharpness (PSR)271.9
Clock drift−11.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−30.9 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.45Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+3.3 dB
Recording file20261109_201923.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−17.8
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.3 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.3 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−15.4
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−20.3 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB20.0 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB3.7 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB15.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges83.4 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz81.3 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor58.0 %
SPLloudness contour over time93.4 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz62.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination791 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −5.6 dB · noticeable, match 40%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −0.1 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.2 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.1 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−1.3 dB
RMS L / R−21.0 / −19.7 dB
Peak L / R−0.3 / −0.4 dB
L/R correlation0.759
L/R delay+0.07 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−1.2 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −14.4 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −6.9 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −4.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +1.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −2.0 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −6.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +4.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +4.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +0.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.8 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −4.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.5 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.8 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.4 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +1.2 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +1.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +0.2 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.