New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000265
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 08:16
Participant: Jcd
Car: —
Microphone: Phone + external microphone
Overall quality
Total: 576 / 1000
Tonal balance143 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity129 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape114 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics74 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour76 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness40 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
12.5 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
76.1 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
below 200 Hz (up to +14.1 dB)
Dip in the region
400 Hz – 1.6 kHz (up to −8.4 dB)
Slight treble excess
12 – 16 kHz (up to +4.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +13.2 dB strong excess
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +7.2 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz −2.9 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.8 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity47.5 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)64.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)75.8 %
Dynamic similarity49.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)39.6 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score576 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 200 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 200 Hz, −6…12 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 400 Hz – 1.6 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.8
High: 12 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 12 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
Mid: 2 – 2.5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2 kHz, +2…3 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

Check the crossovers and phase at 2 – 2.5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.456
Track start in the recording2.39 s
Compared segment1:57
Correlation0.437
Peak sharpness (PSR)55.9
Clock drift−103.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−59.8 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio26.9 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.62Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+22.4 dB
Recording filePXL_20261110_080538948~2.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.2−33.1
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−10.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−10.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−30.7
RMSaverage power−17.7 dB−32.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.7 dB22.9 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB4.2 dB
DRdynamic range12.1 dB12.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance76.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges47.5 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz64.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor49.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time75.8 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz39.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination576 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +13.2 dB · significant, match 11%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +7.2 dB · significant, match 30%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −2.9 dB · small, match 62%
Vocals and instruments may sound distant, “recessed”.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.8 dB · excellent, match 87%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+60.8 dB
RMS L / R−29.9 / −90.6 dB
Peak L / R−10.0 / −76.7 dB
L/R correlation0.009
L/R delay0.00 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+60.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +13.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +15.6 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +14.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +12.4 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +9.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +11.3 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +9.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +7.5 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +4.6 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −0.9 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −6.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −4.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −2.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −8.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −6.8 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −3.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.2 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +2.2 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance 0.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.7 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +3.5 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +1.6 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −54.5 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.